Peer review, human nature and scientific publication
Peer review determines what gets published and what gets funded in science and technology, at least in academia. Since most (all?) institutions evaluate their researchers based on their publication and fund raising records, the defining principle of scientific life. It is what distinguishes the respected professional from the mad scientist operating unchecked in his garage/home office. A bulletin from the Office of Management and Budget titled "Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review" ( www.whitehouse.gov/omb/inforeg/peer2004/peer_bulletin.pdf ) gives the following definition: "Peer review is one of the important procedures used to ensure that the quality of published information meets the standards of the scientific and technical community. It is a form of deliberation involving an exchange of judgments about the appropriateness of methods and the strength of the author's inferences. Peer review involves the review of a draft product for quality by spec...